About this blog Subscribe to this blog

Best Five Blogs: Does *Anyone* Like Duncan's Waiver Idea?

image from www.goldminemag.com

I mean, besides the bureaucrats?  If so, I can't find any:  Will States Accept Duncan-Style Reforms for NCLB Relief? EdWeek:  He offered so few details about what that relief would look like that the reporters spent much of the call flummoxed over what the news actually was... Duncan's Disregard for the Constitution Rick Hess:  Our earnest Secretary of Education, who famously (and bizarrely) promised Congress a billion-dollar edu-bonus if it reauthorized NCLB by the administration's deadline and to the President's satisfaction, was back at it on Friday... Duncan Wants to Use NCLB Sanctions to Force More Education Reform Measures FireDogLake: This just sounds like another version of Race to the Top, only a bit worse... What’s Plan C Anyway? Eduwonk:  Congress doesn’t like being preempted – and there is, of course, a natural tension between two co-equal branches of government.  But there are also a host of policy issues at play in this specific instance... “Give me the money or I shoot my foot!” and other political theories of education reform Sherman Dorn: If I had a crystal ball, I would guess this trial balloon will sink ignominiously by the end of the summer... Arnius Duncanus? Mike Petrilli:  Duncan’s plans to tie regulatory relief to new requirements indicates an incredible amount of tone-deafness, not to mention Constitutional ignorance... Give Us What We Want Or You're Dead Jim Horn:  There is a time bomb in your basement, and it is set to explode in 2014, maybe sooner.  Only two people have the ability to disarm it... Image via.  DID I MISS ANY GOOD ONES?  SEE MY TAKE BELOW.



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Best Five Blogs: Does *Anyone* Like Duncan's Waiver Idea?:


Permalink URL for this entry:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

the NEA doesn't like it:

Van Roekel urges regulatory relief without strings attached

NEA: schools don’t need more hoops to jump through

WASHINGTON— In an op-ed published in Politico yesterday and reiterated on a conference call with reporters today, Education Secretary Arne Duncan announced that the Department of Education “will develop a plan that trades regulatory flexibility for reform. If Congress does not complete work on [ESEA] reauthorization soon, we will be prepared with a process that will enable schools to move ahead with reform in the fall.” In the piece, Duncan acknowledged that unless the federal government acts, an “overwhelming number of schools in the country may soon be labeled as ‘failing,’ eventually triggering impractical and ineffective sanctions.” As a result, Duncan continues, “states and districts are spending billions of dollars each year on one-size-fits-all mandates dictated from Washington.”

NEA President Dennis Van Roekel issued the following statement:

“Secretary Duncan has acknowledged the need to intervene if Congress doesn’t act, but he’s clearly signaled that any relief would be coupled with more unmanageable hurdles for schools and students. There is widespread and bipartisan agreement that NCLB is a flawed law that harms every school and every student. Relief that is not provided to every school and every student isn't relief; it's just more of the same bad patchwork quilt of disparities in our education system.

“The logic just doesn’t add up. On the one hand, the U.S. Department of Education acknowledges that the law is broken, but at the same time, the department keeps suggesting more layers of bureaucracy when we should be peeling them away. Our students and schools need regulatory relief, not more hoops to jump through on a never-ending obstacle course. Students need lessons in math, science, reading, technology, and critical thinking, not a master class in bureaucracy. Our cash-strapped schools don’t have the resources to meet the many existing mandates, much less the time and resources to meet another layer of rules or for a lengthy application process to get the government to lift those burdens.

“Do we need to protect disadvantaged students and ensure that districts continue to work to close gaps? The answer is unequivocally, yes. But not by perpetuating a system that allows students to be cast as winners or losers.

“Our members want Congress to get it right this time for them and their students. They want accountability systems with multiple measures of school performance and student learning. They want Congress to revise testing rules to allow students to show what they really know and can do. They want a system that considers students with disabilities and English Language Learners. They want Congress to align the Highly Qualified Teacher (HQT) requirement with the needs of rural and small schools and teachers who teach multiple subjects. And they want Congress to ensure that collective bargaining is respected in critical decisions. Our 3.2 million members are ready to work with government at all levels to ensure that all students get the great public education they deserve.”

To read NEA’s letter to the Dept.of Education containing a proposed list of regulation changes, click here.

For NEAToday.org’s coverage of the call for regulatory relief, click here.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in This Week In Education are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Scholastic, Inc.