About this blog Subscribe to this blog

Unions: Gates Dives $358K Deep Into NEA

800px-DSCN3153 The Gates Foundation has given the NEA Foundation $358K to to create a new institute focused on local innovation.

Maybe the NEA complained that foundations were giving money to the AFT and not to them.  

Or maybe the Gates Foundation realized that, maybe, throwing a little bit of money the NEA's way might help it realize its dreams of total takeover of major changes to the education system.

Subject: News Release:  NEA Foundation Receives $358K Grant from Gates Foundation for Institute

Good Afternoon,

The NEA Foundation has received a $358,000 grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for the creation of the Institute of Local Innovation in Teaching in Learning, a capacity-building engine for collaboration and reform between education unions and their school districts. Local union and district leaders will take part in a three-year process to learn and share knowledge and practices to make significant, measurable changes in collective bargaining agreements and in teaching and learning.

The Institute is an outgrowth of the Foundation’s Closing the Achievement Gap Initiative. <http://www.neafoundation.org/pages/educators/achievement-gaps-initiative/>   As you know, the Foundation has invested $6 million in three district-union partnerships to close achievement gaps in Milwaukee, Wisc.; Chattanooga, Tenn.; and Seattle, Wash.

NEA Foundation’s Institute for Local Innovation in Teaching & Learning Plan Awarded $358K from Gates

Collaborative Effort between Local Unions, School Districts, and Communities to Engage in Deep, Systemic Reform

WASHINGTON, DC (December 14, 2009) – The NEA Foundation announced today a $358,000 grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to plan the creation of the Institute for Local Innovation in Teaching and Learning.  The Institute will serve as a capacity-building engine for collaboration and reform between education unions and their school districts.

The Institute will be designed to engage a cohort of local union and district leaders in a three-year capacity-building process that will lead to significant, measurable changes in collective bargaining agreements and in teaching and learning, including new approaches to the management of human capital and new ways of measuring student learning. By modeling successful new practices with their school districts, these local union leaders also will become catalysts for cultural and organizational change.

Over the course of the next six months, the NEA Foundation will work to create a collaborative architecture for the Institute; complete an initial scan to identify 30 potential local unions and partner school districts; design the content, process, and program evaluation for the first cohort; and develop a fundraising strategy and launch.

“Our plan capitalizes on a growing movement among education unions that are seeking to re-position their locals to engage in innovative reform in partnership with their school districts,” said Harriet Sanford, President and CEO of the NEA Foundation. “It also builds on knowledge gained from existing, research-based body of work, the Foundation’s Closing the Achievement Gaps Initiative<http://www.neafoundation.org/pages/educators/achievement-gaps-initiative/>. With financial support from the Gates Foundation, we believe we can build on this collaborative model and disseminate knowledge gained.”

Some local unions, Sanford added, have already collaborated with districts on human capital practices, including the creation of performance evaluations, peer assistance and review programs, new induction and professional development models, differentiated compensation, and innovations in school design and governance.  The Institute will now allow the development of a system to ensure that this work is deepened, shared more broadly, and sustained.

“So many of our union leaders, particularly entities involved in the Teachers Union Reform Network (TURN), have been working in isolation to address the complex issues relating to improving student achievement. Union leaders have been searching for help and support as they tackle the tough work in their local communities of improving teacher appraisal systems, teacher effectiveness, attracting and retaining teachers and removing time-honored policies and practices that impede schools from implementing a change agenda,” said Mary McDonald, Core Service Director, Consortium for Educational Change, a TURN member, and a planning partner.   “The NEA Foundation’s Institute for Local Innovation in Teaching and Learning will provide an opportunity for local leaders to address these challenges together – learning from and building upon each other’s efforts to improve our teaching profession in every community.”


The NEA Foundation
The NEA Foundation is an independent public charity created in 1969 and sustained by contributions from educators, corporate sponsors, and other supporters of public education.  The Foundation offers grants and programs that support educators' efforts to close the achievement gaps, increase classroom innovations, provide professional development, and salute excellence in education. Visit neafoundation.org<http://www.neafoundation.org/> for more information.

Teacher Union Reform Network
TURN is a network of NEA and AFT locals. Leaders of the TURN locals assemble three times per year to discuss and explore issues related to education reform and the role of teacher unions in advancing the cause of public education. Visithttp://www.turnexchange.net for more information.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Unions: Gates Dives $358K Deep Into NEA:


Permalink URL for this entry:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Too bad Gates didn't think it was more worthwhile to form a billion-dollar foundation that would pay off public agencies to coerce everyone in the U.S. to lop off one ear, paint their houses turquoise blue, and name their firstborn Sue. A lot less damage would have been done.

How far are people willing to let this one man go with buying our nation's public education policy just because it is the type he personally prefers? At this point, the whole thing is disgusting.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in This Week In Education are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Scholastic, Inc.