About this blog Subscribe to this blog

BOOKS: Was Atticus Finch Really A Radical?

Mocking080309 Lots of people love To Kill A Mockingbird, and I'm guessing it's still taught in a lot of classes. 

Here, the book gets the Malcolm Gladwell treatment in the New Yorker (Atticus Finch and Southern liberalism), including some questioning of just how much of a radical Atticus Finch (and the real-life person the character was based on) really were:

“Big Jim did not seek a fundamental shift of political power or a revolution in social mores,” Sims says. Folsom operated out of a sense of noblesse oblige: privileged whites, he believed, ought to “adopt a more humanitarian attitude” toward blacks"


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BOOKS: Was Atticus Finch Really A Radical?:


Permalink URL for this entry:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

thanks for the information, its very useful to us

The comments to this entry are closed.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in This Week In Education are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Scholastic, Inc.