About this blog Subscribe to this blog

Does More Reading Make For Better Social Studies?

EdWeek's recent NAEP test results story (Test Gains Reigniting Old Debate) does a good job exposing the ritualized response that follows the release of NAEP scores as various folks try and make sense of the results (and, often, bolster their cause).

How big were the gains, and were they attributable to -- or in spite of -- the focus on reading and math that has come with NCLB and Reading First? Not surprisingly, the Administration takes the view that all good things stem from NCLB, while others -- social studies advocates, for example -- aren't so sure that federal programs have helped with any but the most basic results. Meanwhile, time for social studies has declined a half hour per day since 1998, and time for reading has increased by an hour.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Does More Reading Make For Better Social Studies?:


Permalink URL for this entry:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

As a historian, I am appalled with the lack of interest administration has in my content area. In fact, at the k-8 school I teach in, next year we won't bother to have a social studies course at all-we'll just combine it with English and call it humanities.

No wonder my students were practically in tears over the state social studies exam today.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in This Week In Education are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Scholastic, Inc.