Despite all that's been written about Michelle Rhee in recent months, there's still much to like about this month's Atlantic magazine profile (The Lightning Rod).
For example, writer Clay Risen does an excellent job of describing Michelle Rhee's demeanor and technocratic outlook on school reform. His piece raises concerns about economic displacement that have sometimes been left out of the DC reform story. He does a good job placing Rhee squarely among those not focused on external factors like poverty and crime. And he notes that there are complicated politics still lying in the way of Rhee's success. All strong elements, executed with greater style and insight than anything I could have done.
However, there are a number of other things about the piece that are concerning -- whether you support Rhee's efforts or not. The piece leaves out how Rhee seems to have backed the teachers union into a corner from which it can only fight. It leaves out the reality that many, many nontraditional superintendents have been brought into urban districts on white horses, only to fall prey to complicated politics. It underplays just how much more confrontational Rhee's approach is than the previous half-generation of reformers with which Rhee is associated.
Right or wrong, my feeling is that Rhee has at times been unnecessarily confrontational in public, that her tenure has yet to distinguish itself from previous efforts in other big cities, and that the media has by and large swooned for the past year plus.
Previous posts: Hyping Michelle Rhee, Not Your Average Profile, A Contrast In Tactics.