Projecting Twitter feeds onto a screen during meetings and conferences is the cool thing to do in some circles these days. You hear and read about it all the time these days -- most recently in that TIME magazine article from last week that I'm too lazy to look up for you.
The 140-character comments of those at the meeting and those watching in online scroll past as panelists drone one. No one has to hit refresh on their iPhone keep up on what the Twitterati have to say about the event, even as it happens. No one has to worry about being mocked on Twitter without knowing it's happening, in real time.
I have yet to experience it first hand, but it sounds like it might feel sort of like being telepathic, in the sense that it lets you know what people are thinking (saying) even if they don't utter a single word aloud during an event. And it's not all that different from Google jockeying or Google talking, which people do all the time. Perhaps soon the President and his Cabinet officials will have Twitter
updates posted to their TelePrompters (or to aides holding cue cards in
the back of the room) so that they can know what we're thinking about
as they speak to us, and adjust accordingly. Hell, a Twitter screen up on the wall at a hearing or markup could be in the works already.
The real question is whether the practice is simply reflecting the distracted, frenzied way people think and communicate these days, or is it actually making the conversation more fractured for those who are actually at the event? What do those of you who've experienced it first hand think about it?