The cappuccino story doesn't seem to have much legs when it comes to derailing the Duncan appointment, though some have noted the lackluster coverage in Chicago (ChiTrib Leaves Out Duncan Mention) and the mini-scandal could have implications for the CPS officials who work on high school and voc ed programs (Gilligan, et al) -- some of whom may have wanted to rise within CPS or move to DC with Duncan.
Meanwhile, I hear that various outlets are gearing up for publishing bigger stories on Monday or Tues. And Senate staffers are working on questions for their bosses on the HELP committee.
Some suggestions that are sure not to be taken up:
- Dr. -- I mean, Mr. -- Duncan, did you brew that cup of coffee in front of you on one of those
pricey cappuccino makers, or did you have an intern buy it downstairs like the rest of
us?
- Is it true that you going to make us all look bad by sending your children to public school, or will you reconsider and do the right thing and choose Georgetown or Sidwell?
- What about the issue of your recusing yourself during discussions of NCLB, given given how much you hate and undercut the law in Chicago? Do you think that's really workable?
-Or, what about Congress adopting Chicago's homegrown and less rigorous accountability and school rating system and getting rid of those cut scores and subgroup requirements in NCLB?
Other questions the committee should ask? You've got five minutes.