Ideas: [When] Will Reformers Join The Inequality Party?
The Washington Post's Ezra Klein & Co. recently gave out their Third annual Wonky awards, including think tank of the year (Kaiser), pundi (Bob Laszewski), graph of the year (the deficit shrinking), FAIL of the year, regulation of the year, etc.
There wasn't anything education-related that I saw, but the academics of the year (Saez and Piketty) have brought lots of attention to an education-related issue that reform critics especially like to bring up all the time these days: income inequality.
Last year made inequality big:
"Obama devoted a whole speech to the topic. Bill de Blasio was elected mayor of New York on a promise to fight it. The think tank closest to the administration launched a whole spin-off dedicated to studying it."
What if anything will reformers figure out to say in the face of all this newfound attention to inquality (and poverty and income mobility)?
They traditionally shy away from these issues, though many of them got into education because they thought that education could help address them -- was indeed the best method of doing so. But obviously education can't be the only method of addressing income inequality, and especially so during and after a massive recession.
Reformers may have to reconnect with why they got into education in the first place -- and even support some non-education measures like minimum wage and immigration reform -- if they don't want to be left out of the inequality party of 2014.
Flickr via KenFager