About this blog Subscribe to this blog

Thompson: Fall Testing Is A Great Idea (Even If It Comes From TFA)

StopJustin “Juice" Fong, who runs internal communications at Teach for America, in his blog post A Simple Idea to Reform Standardized Testing, offers the single best idea that I have heard to end the educational civil war that is undermining sincere efforts both sides for improving schools. 

I just wish I had thought of it!

Fong would move testing to the beginning of the year. 

Tests could then be used for diagnostic purposes, and teachers could collaboratively engage in an item-by-item analysis in the first month of school. That would help them plan for the rest of the year.

Test results could still be used as one way to assess the quality of schools.  September testing would cut down on test prep, and might become a tool for preventing summer learning loss.  

Fong says that the scheduling change would be a productive way to “blur the lines that directly tie teacher performance to high stakes test scores.”

Fong reminds me of a conversation with my district’s top testing experts on the eve of NCLB.  They predicted, chapter and verse, the corruption of data that would be inevitable when we changed from Norm Reference Tests, that could be given early in the year, to end of the year Criterion Reference Tests. They nailed the ways that the arcane change would lead to gamesmanship or worse.

Fong’s suggestion could not come at a better time.  It would provide an exit strategy for reformers facing a lose lose scenario. Staying the course on bubble-in teacher evaluations while attempting the opposite – the transition to Common Core assessments - is a recipe for disaster. Regarding both issues, it would allow accountability-driven reformers an opportunity to “declare a victory and leave.”

Advocates of Gates-style teacher quality reforms could still use test scores for incentives. Fong’s suggestion, by making it virtually impossible to use test scores to punish teachers, would build trust.  This would facilitate collaborative efforts to use qualitative metrics to dismiss ineffective teachers.

Fall testing would also help reformers extricate themselves from the fatal flaw of Common Core assessments in high-poverty schools where students face graduation exams.  Old-fashioned graduation tests were designed to be basic skills tests ensuring that students meet minimum standards.  When those primitive tests are replaced by Common Core end of instruction tests, the dropout rates in urban districts will soar.

If Robert Hammond, Colorado’s education commissioner, is correct and Common Core leads to the “greatest assessment in the history of American public education,” its value will not be diminished by removing its punitive aspects. It would be an equally great assessment if given in the fall. If it is truly wonderful enough to be a "test worth teaching to," it will also be a test worth teaching with i.e. a tool for teaching and learning as opposed to a weapon for coercing teachers and students.-JT(@drjohnthompson) Image via.   

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I remember helping with a diagnostic test at the beginning of the year in my daughter's fifth-grade class. It was OK for a mom to help because nobody was getting rewarded or punished over this test, and the results weren't getting crunched by the California Department of Education or getting splashed in charts all over the daily paper or promoted by the Board of Realtors. There were no stakes at all. The test was just to see where the kids were academically as they started their last year of elementary school, so the teacher could work with them accordingly.

What a concept, huh? A test designed to help the teacher teach and the students learn?

This is an old idea, and in fact some states do it already. I am also surprised that fong believes that teachers don't currently talk to teachers from other grades to help sanity check the relationship between what is taught when and where. Are these the 'future leaders' TFA is grooming?

navigio,
So, back to the future. Why the personal attack?

Against whom?

Against Justin Fong.

Wow.

Sorry. I am new here. I did not realize critiquing the stories on this blog was not allowed. I will refrain in the future.
But for the record, it would be nice if people leading education reform in this country actually knew something about education. Thats not a personal attack, its just a desire of mine. I am sorry not everyone agrees with me on that.

It isn't no-stakes if the corporate reform industry controls the tests. This is the newest testing fallback meme, now that "accountability" overreach and corruption has awakened public disgust..

Round up your business buddies and back off, John. We'll do our own testing, thank you very much, without any of their their poisonous input at all.

Welcome, navigio. The "personal attack" meme is the last refuge of this loose conspiracy of competing scoundrels. It means they have no response to the substance of your excellent comment.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in This Week In Education are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Scholastic, Inc.