LAUSD: John Deasy Vs. Mike Bloomberg
The NYT's Jenny Medina weighs in with a new story about the LAUSD school board race, whose primary day is tomorrow. And, while much of the material is familiar, the story reminds us that LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy has been less much divisive a personality than, say, Joel Klein in NYC or Michelle Rhee in DC.
Indeed, though they oppose Deasy at nearly every turn -- threatening to block a proposal to make student achievement 30 percent of teacher evaluations is the last example -- the teachers union and many of its endorsed candidates have been very careful not to try and run against him.
Running against NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg is much easier -- and in fact has become the union's main talking point. Medina reports that Bloomberg has only given to an unspecified handful of local school board races in the past, and that StudentsFirst has only given to two (West Sacramento and Burbank).
However, the most useful part of the NYT story is that it reminds us that this year's race is part of a long-running series of conflicts between reform-minded mayors and UTLA going back at least to 2006-2007, when Villaraigosa tried to gain direct control of the school system.
For more on the history of this conflict, look at the $7 million showdown between the Mayor and UTLA in 2007, the last time the school board was up for grabs (and direct contributions were unlimited). For more about the rise in outside spending nationally, read about the DC mayoral primary in which AFT spent $1 million to get rid of Michelle Rhee (and was smart enough not to brag about it ahead of time).
Want the really nitty-gritty stuff? Read about an uncomfortable encounter between former allies Steve Zimmer and Joan Sullivan (Mayor Villaraigosa's education deputy). And check out the nasty and largely deceptive mailers that are being sent out (including the one pictured here). You can follow all the latest via @laschoolreport.


Are you sure that these are the first two local school board races to receive cash from StudentsFirst? I believe the reporter was referring to races up for election tomorrow. You seem to be implying all races, ever.
Posted by: Bea | March 04, 2013 at 11:27 AM
I keep seeing references to Villaraigosa's failed effort to take control of the school district, but they never mention the obvious logistical problem that definitively derailed it: Sprawling LAUSD is not contiguous with the city of Los Angeles and includes other communities. One can imagine that it could get pretty complex handing over the district to just the mayor of Los Angeles.
The implication is that it was just politics that blocked the effort, but that would seem like quite a confounding logistical factor -- in fact, I think reasonable observers would say that the attempt would obviously be futile given that situation.
Posted by: CarolineSF | March 04, 2013 at 12:08 PM
Thanks CarolineSF, for pointing out what we've been saying all along. As a resident of one of the 'small cities' who fought against AB 1387, and yet, is hardly an LAUSD apologist, there is no way I can condone handing over the education of my kids to someone I can not vote for--nor even has kids in the schools.
Posted by: Angel | March 05, 2013 at 14:18 PM