July 25, 2012 | Posted At: 05:10 PM | Author: Alexander Russo | Category: (Who Cares What) Research Says , Five Best Blogs [Of The Day]
Five Best Blogs: Cut K12 To Finance Early Childhood Funding
The Value of Pre-K Education, Take 2 | Mother Jonesow.ly/cuz4g @KevinDrum
Should we cut K-12 schools to finance pre-K?ow.ly/cuz0k @mattyglesias
Obama’s Education Hits and Misses ow.ly/1OmXLj@TakePart
Arne Duncan, Tennessee, and y1 of the new teacher evaluation -- ow.ly/cuUg4
How Mixed Neighborhoods Could Save America's Schools- TheAtlantic theatlantic.com/national/archi… via @MichaelPetrilli


Rarely did schools used to take pre-K education seriously. I wasn’t allowed to enter preschool, for reasons beyond my understanding at the time, as a kid. I learned years later that our district required parents to pay $6,500 a year for the privilege of attending pre-K for three hours a day.
Posted by: Sarah | July 26, 2012 at 09:46 AM
True indeed. Schools have never seemed so serious with it and although it cannot be denied of the beneficent influence pre-K education brings to our children, there is an even more need to teach these children what they deserve to learn at that age.
Posted by: Rudy | August 02, 2012 at 13:31 PM