About this blog Subscribe to this blog

Pearson: Lots Of Questions About Corporate Foundations

ScreenHunter_04 Oct. 12 16.20Concerns about private sector influence over public policy keep coming up -- not just in education, and not just from the political fringe.

There's Jane Meyer's big New Yorker article about corporate giving to nonprofit organizations involved in an effort to influence political elections (and school board elections, too). There's the constant trickle of stories about speaking fees for reporters and corporate support for journalism.  And of course there's Mike Winerip's recent column on the cozy relationship between Pearson, the Pearson Foundation, and the Council of Chief State Officers.

Of course, not all corporate foundations operate the way Winerip describes.  And not everyone is convinced that what the foundation did is such a bad thing.  Officials in Kentucky continue to defend their participation on the junkets.  In which case, why bother going through a foundation and a nonprofit? Others aren't so sure. Whitney Tilson describes the Pearson Foundation situation as "stinking to high heaven."  Matt Yglesias describes the idea that trips don't have any influence as "naive."  Want to know more about Pearson (the company, not the foundation)?  Check out this feature from the Texas Observer published a long piece about Pearson from a month ago.  

Any other examples of corporate foundations stretching or breaking the law in order to win contracts or influence policy?  Any exonerating information out there about the trips?  Let us know.  
Comments

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f8c25c988340154354fead0970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pearson: Lots Of Questions About Corporate Foundations:

Permalink

Permalink URL for this entry:
http://scholasticadministrator.typepad.com/thisweekineducation/2011/10/the-pearson-graduate-the-texas-observer.html

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This is so disappointing.  As the Foundation has said over and over, we categorically refute any suggestion that our relationship with CCSSO is improper, or intended to promote sales for Pearson, the commercial company.  Have you seen the positive results of the Summits?  See here and here.  Check out CCSSO’s reports, review the critical lessons learned during the meetings, and judge for yourself.

thanks for the comment.
here's the letter the foundation put out expressing dismay at the winerip columns but not to my reading disputing any of the facts.

http://pearsonfoundation.org/mnstatement.html

Zounds. Mark is disappointed.

I, on the other hand, am a little bit inspired to see someone standing on a piece of ground Pearson doesn't own.

Really, I have no knowledge about corporate foundations & the Pearson Foundation, and the Council of Chief State Officers. Thanks for asking lots of information related to these topics........

The comments to this entry are closed.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in This Week In Education are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Scholastic, Inc.