About this blog Subscribe to this blog

Media: The Cheating "Crisis" & Teacher Culpability

Typewriter-007Like others I'm a big fan of education writer Dana Goldstein (and love the line in her latest piece about the current mood of "brutal optimism" about testing). But the piece in Slate - about how "a growing spate of evidence from around the country suggests that the most egregious practices in Atlanta... are part of a national, and indeed a historic trend... bolstered by No Child Left Behind's emphasis on pressuring educators to produce spectacular test results" -- seems overheated in its claims and makes several questionable connections. Goldstein presents no real evidence that there is a cheating crisis going on in America, greatly overstates NCLB's real-world threat to educators, and seems to presume that educators are both unable to resist everyday temptations and shouldn't be included among those who should be held accountable for their actions. To all of this and more, I protest.   

No doubt, we've seen a slew of cheating scandals lately, the details of which -- test-fixing parties and high-level coverups in Atlanta, for example -- are infuriating. We should all be concerned about the integrity of the system and the ways in which we try and make schools and teachers more accountable for their results.  I share her concern about the overuse of test results, especially in areas like individual value-added ratings for classroom teachers.   

But Goldstein musters no real evidence beyond a handful of newspaper articles that cheating is dramatically on the rise, proportionally, or is particularly problematic in education as opposed to many other fields that involve testing. Cheating incidents are like shark sightings and crime reports; they are amplified by the media (which loves "trends") and are easily influenced by changes in definitions and reporting requirements.  At least some of the current cheating "trend" is the result of media outlets furiously imitating USA Today and the Washington Post.  It's ironic that the Goldstein piece is published in Slate, whose media columnist regularly debunks fake media trends.

Second, Goldstein substantially overemphasizes NCLB's influence and suggests a causal relationship between cheating and the law that isn't backed up by any real evidence. The creaky law's sanctions are notoriously weak -- a toothless transfer requirement, a watered-down after-school tutoring requirement, and a hodge-podge of school improvement efforts that weren't even implemented in most parts of the country. Relatively few kids, teachers, and schools have had their fates upended by NCLB (though many may have been told that is the case, and the Obama program called SIG has increased the number of closures and restaffing in recent years). The only real consequence of NCLB is an easily-dismissed annual rating that isn't even required to be displayed on the front door. 

Most troubling to me is Goldstein and others' suggestion that teachers and educators are somehow helpless to resist the notion of teaching and by extension shouldn't be held accountable for their actions. The world is full of opportunities to cheat - on taxes, in sports, at the checkout register, on payroll day -- and yet in most of these situations our notions of individual will and accountability remain. If testing and federal accountability systems were as bad -- as powerful, as destructive, as immoral -- as Goldstein suggests, then what I hope we'd have had annual protests nationally & widespread refusals by teachers to administer the tests (or by administrators to collect them) rather than a decade of going along with a corrupt system.  But that's not what's happened, according to Goldstein. She seems to suggest that if someone tells educators to cheat, they will do so, out of concern for bringing shame on their school or to keep their jobs.  I just don't think that's true.  

Yes, there's some cheating in education.  Yes it should be addressed.  But the most pernicious forms of cheating are systematic efforts in which schools and districts manipulate subgroup sizes and enrollment dates or states and elected officials and reform advocates cherry-pick data to give the impression. And we should neither overestimate accountability-based laws like NCLB nor ignore educators' roles in implementing them.  Whatever has or hasn't happened over the past decade under NCLB implicates nearly everyone in education, including teachers.  

Comments

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f8c25c98834015433f6d0c5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Media: The Cheating "Crisis" & Teacher Culpability:

Permalink

Permalink URL for this entry:
http://scholasticadministrator.typepad.com/thisweekineducation/2011/07/cheating.html

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I think the bathwater has been turned up one degree at time, in a sense -- that policies that sounded reasonable on their face have gradually revealed themselves, increasingly, to be powerful, destructive and immoral.

Now we are seeing a national protest (the one that Jay Greene says will make teachers look like longshoremen beating victims with lead pipes).

I think it's simplistic and uncomprehending to declare that teachers should just say no to cheating, given the complex and insidious forces adding to the pressure to cheat. That's even though I agree, of course, that teachers should just say no to cheating.

The fact that these bad -- powerful, destructive and immoral -- policies are so very heavily promoted by our political leadership (including leaders heavily supported by teachers, like Obama), by the mainstream press and by forces with huge money to promote their favored policies makes it tougher to see through them immediately.

I think sometimes teachers are responsible for cheating crises. Students follow the teachers and if teachers help them in any cheating then they are not learning any good thing.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in This Week In Education are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Scholastic, Inc.