About this blog Subscribe to this blog

Thompson: D.C. Scandal Shows Why We Still Need Checks and Balances

BlindJustice Perhaps the defining characteristic of this generation of young accountability hawks is their impatience with institutions that slow their righteous crusade to transform schools.  For instance, the main idea of mayoral control of schools in D.C. and elsewhere is to remove obstacles to "reform." USA Today's analysis of possible cheating in D.C. schools reveals a system that was oblivious to the need for checks and balances.  Firstly, D.C. claimed that its internal investigation of testing irregularities was adequate.  Then, members of the State Board of Education were kept in the dark about the findings of outside investigators.  The district created an environment where students' and teachers' concerns were ignored, and it lived up to its reputation of disrepecting parents. The District alone decided what newspaper stories were worthy, as it stonewalled other investigations.  It only cooperated with "the fourth branch of government" when it made them look good. Our constitutional democracy can be slow, but the Washington Post reports that now there will be independent investigations.- JT (@drjohnthompson) Image via.   

Comments

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f8c25c988340147e3947f25970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Thompson: D.C. Scandal Shows Why We Still Need Checks and Balances:

Permalink

Permalink URL for this entry:
http://scholasticadministrator.typepad.com/thisweekineducation/2011/03/thompson-why-we-still-need-checks-and-balances.html

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

The Administr@tor RSS Widget
Share Administr@tor content with your online community and get the latest education stories and product reviews automatically. LEARN MORE

Advertisement

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in This Week In Education are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Scholastic, Inc.