Sattler: Now Show Me a REAL Blueprint
My father is an engineer, and I know from blueprints. Blueprints have details, specifics.
The document published to launch the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) reauthorization is not a blueprint.
So, in the absence of any real details, here's my analysis of what's in and what's out in the new proposal.
IN OUT
Career and College Ready Standards Challenging State Standards
2020...sort of 2014
Bilingual and other ways of teaching English-language acquisition
kids English
Innovation Based in scientifically based research
growth Adequate yearly progress
Highly effective Highly qualified
Challenge Schools Failing schools
4 improvement models "Other major restructuring"
multiple measures (undefined) Multiple measures (1 test)
Race to the Top Race to the Bottom
ESEA NCLB
competitive/formula funding hybrid Competitive/formula funding hybrid
"Flexible funding streams" Specific, small programs
Equitable distribution of effective teachers Equitable distribution of HQ teachers
Principal and teacher evaluation systems Professional development
Parent's right-to-know Biannual teacher and principal report cards
Teacher Incentive Fund with stakeholder Teacher Incentive Fund
involvement
Statewide definitions for English-language District-by-district definitions for English-language
learners learners
"A complete education" (at state discretion) Reading & Math
Successful, Safe & Healthy Students Safe & drug-free Schools
Charter schools Public school choice
Incentives Sanctions
What am I missing?

