August 10, 2007 | Posted At: 12:14 PM | Author: Alexander Russo | Category: Foundation / Advocacy Follies
Wall Street Journal Questions Hype & Foundation's Role In Pushing Universal Preschool
First off, don't think you have to pay good money to read yesterday's big Wall Street Journal article on universal preschool. It's all here for free (As States Tackle Poverty, Preschool Gets High Marks).
Once there, you'll see that the piece deals more forthrightly than most with questions about the hype surrounding UPK, and brings up the often-ignored issue of Head Start. (If UPK is such a great and transformative idea -- so much so that Hillary Clinton wants to nationalize it -- how come Head Start hasn't done the trick and is being bypassed?)
The article also highlights the role of the Pew Charitable Trust, which is paying for programs, research, and advocacy efforts that include NIEER, the Hechinger Institute's work on early education, etc. (Think Gates and small schools seven years ago and you get the idea of what Pew is trying to do here -- and can probably imagine some of the questions that should come up.)
Take note also of how the piece ends with a warning: "There's a great danger here that people are going to rush out and with blind enthusiasm endorse very superficial programs," says one economist who has studied the impact of preschool programs.
Once there, you'll see that the piece deals more forthrightly than most with questions about the hype surrounding UPK, and brings up the often-ignored issue of Head Start. (If UPK is such a great and transformative idea -- so much so that Hillary Clinton wants to nationalize it -- how come Head Start hasn't done the trick and is being bypassed?)
The article also highlights the role of the Pew Charitable Trust, which is paying for programs, research, and advocacy efforts that include NIEER, the Hechinger Institute's work on early education, etc. (Think Gates and small schools seven years ago and you get the idea of what Pew is trying to do here -- and can probably imagine some of the questions that should come up.)
Take note also of how the piece ends with a warning: "There's a great danger here that people are going to rush out and with blind enthusiasm endorse very superficial programs," says one economist who has studied the impact of preschool programs.


Funny, you could say all the same things about charter schools, including the Sainted (all kneel) KIPP -- hype, foundations' roles and all. Of course the WSJ is a prime hypemeister in those cases, since those fads are beloved by the right.
Posted by: Caroline | August 10, 2007 at 12:31 PM
One of the dirty little secrets of New York's Universal Pre K program is the almost complete lack of oversight of the community based agencies which receive 10% of each school district's funding. There is no attempt to make sure that the programs meet other than minimal standards. As a result some children are in programs which are, at best, useless and at worst,harmful.
Posted by: Johanna Green | August 13, 2007 at 00:01 AM
Universal Preschool?
Or UN control of IB programs a beginning of WORLD GOVONMENT.
In our district IB increased by 1000% this year. Now every school has IB programs.
Bob
Posted by: Bob Brewster Consultant | August 15, 2007 at 07:43 AM